CAG
|
- Article 148 - Guardian of public purse
- A 149 - parlia - prescribe power & duties - CAG act, 1971
- Financial acctly - of exec to parlia- guide PAC
- 4 bulwark of
democracy: SC, UPSC, EC, CAG
- Ambedkar:
- most important
office under the constitution
|
Independence
|
- Security of tenure - removal like SC judge
- No post-retirement job,
- Salary & services determined by parliament,
- Admin power of IA&AS
- expenditure charged upon CFI
|
Function
|
- Types of audit:
- Compliance audit (Obligatory)-with rules & regulation
- Finance audit - financial & regulatory framework FRBM
- Performance audit: (discretionary) - Economy, efficiency & effectiveness
- Efficiency audit: largely of PSUs
- Propriety audits: wisdom behind the financial transaction
- Audit and report:
- CFI, PAI, Contingency FI
- expenditure and receipt
- All accounts of depts.
of union and state
- Substantially financed
bodies by the govt.
- Audit of Govt.
corporation
- Other: if President and
governor thinks so
- helps the FC
- For states it maintains
the accounts also
- 3 report to prez Appropriation account, Finance Account, Public Undertaking account
|
Issues
|
- Appointed by central govt - COI - Qn on exec accountability
- Post facto Audit
- Only auditor, not comptroller unlike UK
- Not member of parlia - UK
- Exceed mandate - eg -2g, Coal scam, Overreach - Propriety audits
- Policy Paralysis - bureau bcom risk-averse ,
- audit delays,
- 1% report analysed by PAC
- Right to information of
CAG is weaker then citizens
- Single-member or multi
member body
- Accountability of CAG
- Non-disclosure of its
reports
- Expertise:
- New tools, business, and
in other roles like industries etc, it lacks expertise
- Archaic thinking: it has
not change itself as per the new business techniques
|
Appointment
|
- At the discretion of
Executive
- Elsewhere consultative
process
- Australia : subject to
approval of PAC
- US : subject to
confirmation by Senate
- UK : through resolution
followed by an agreement between PM and chairperson PAC
- Should be appointed by
collegium system (PM. LoP. CJI)
- Generalist vs Specialist
: Generally appointed an IAS officer
- Conflict of interest
- Lack of expertise and
knowledge
- Qualification: not given
in constituents
|
Single member body
|
- No comparative study done
on multi-member body
- Most countries follow
single member body
|
Propriety
Audit
|
- For
- Tax payer's money: Better
scrutiny
- Major Frauds : can only
be unearthed by it like 2G scam
- Can be seen as extended
powers
- Against
- Context: may not be able
to comprehend
- leading to abrupt
estimation
- Knowledge: limited about
policy and administration
- Invasive audit: affect
decision-making power
- overreaching the
administrative domains of the executive
- Differentiation: Bonafide
mistake and malafide intentions
- APPLEBY's Criticism
- Admintration and auditing
are two different things.
- CAG do not know much
about the problems
- Conclusion
- Role of Audit: improving
governance rather than fault finding
- Internal Audit:
- Should be made better
- quality improvement can
improve the relationship
- Watchdog not blood
hound
|
Power and capacity
|
- Understaffed
- Audit queries: not replied
promptly
- RTI power is Even smaller
then an ordinary men
- No power of civil court
|
Accountability to
Parliament
|
- Benefits
- Will reduce discretionary
powers of CAG, enhance answerability of its actions and ensure its
strict adherence to auditing procedures.
- Expertise to
accountability in Parliament
- Already in US, Australia
and UK
- Concerns
- CAG will loose
independence
- Overburdening
- Balance between executive
and the legislature will be disturbed
- Conclusion
- It is not the Parliament
that is supreme, it is the Constitution. CAG already is accountable to
constitutional provisions. Making CAG accountable to parliament has
apparent benefits but it will undermine the institution's sanctity and
independence.
- It may be allowed that
CAG may take part in parliamentary proceedings from time to time and
bring its expertise for cases to cases, rather than becoming directly
accountable to parliament
|
New roles and
reports
|
- Private:
- SC has allowed for the
audits of Private telecom companies that exploit public assets
- Private telcos are
supposed to pay license fee and spectrum usage charges to the
government annually. As per CAG telecom players suppressed revenues
through account adjustments
- Schemes
- Dept.:
|
way forward
|
|
Comments
Post a Comment