Election commission
|
- ECI Act 1991
- Convention : no
re-appointment
- Power of ECs:
- Article 324
- Conduct of election rules
1961
- Election symbols order
1968
- Kanahiya Lal Omar case
1985 case:
- Power of the EC are
uncontrolled by the executives
- Reservoir of power:
where law is silent ECI automatically got the power
- Executive
cannot interfere in scheduling of the election.
- Other officers:
- chief electoral
officer---district electoral officer---returning officer---booth
presiding----observer.
|
Issues
|
- Independence
- No qualification
mentioned for CEC in constitution
- Removal of election
commissioners other than CEC is on advice of CEC
- No mention of further
employment under constitution
- Expenditure not charged upon CFI, needs parliamentary approval
- No Independent
secretariat
- Power:
- MCC is only advisory, no
mechanism to enforce it.
- No contempt power
allegations
- No formal mechanism to
recommend changes to electoral laws.
- No power to deregister
political parties under RPA
- No effective power to
control political parties, inner democracy.
- Allegations:
- Partisan role being
played by ECI in favouring government
- Hacking and Tampering of
EVM
|
Implications:
|
- Breakdown of democratic
principles
- Erosion of Institutional
integrity
- Loss of people's trust in
elections
- Degradation of political
discourse
- Politicization of election
commission
|
Solution
|
- Independence:
- Appointment:
- 2/3rd majority of both
the house of the parliament.
- by collegium
system
- Tharkunde Committee
1974:
- LCI 255th report Advice of panel (PM, CJI and
LoO)
- Removal of EC: similar to
CEC or SC (security of tenure)
- Service conditions to not
be changed
- CEC:
- Seniority principle for
appointment of CEC
- Colling off period: 10
years for any office of profit or political parties
- Charged expenditure on
CFI
- Power
- MCC Enforceability
- Contempt power (EVM case)
- Give powers by amending
RPA for use of money power
- example: TN assembly
poll corruption case (has to rely on extraordinary power)
- Accountability
- But financial audits
are done by cag and reports are published in parliament
- Perception of
partisanship:
- EVM tempering but then
came up with hackathon.
- Administration: Administration:
Independent secretariat so it does not depend DoPT.
- RPA amendment : can
adjourned and countermined election in case of use of money power.
|
Reforms Done:
|
- Provision of NOTA in PUCL
vs. UOI, 2013
- Decriminalization of
Politics: Lily thomas case, 2013, declaration of criminal charges
- Introduction of Electoral
Bonds: Transparency in electoral funding
- Tackling the menace of
paid news by ECI
- Proposal of totalizer
machine for consolidated results
- Introduction of VVPAT to
cross-check election results
- Lok Prahari Case:
Disclosure of sources of income, his spouse and dependents
- Other: Restructuring
election cycle and establish a hybrid model.
- ECI:
- Voter education and
participation, 2019 highest turnout, SVEEP is effective
- Credibility of voting,
VVPAT slip and EVM count
- ECI took strong action
against erring parties under 324.
- Action against money
power, under 324.
|
Way forward
|
- "Although highly
political in terms of its actions, the Election Commission has
developed and maintained a public reputation as an independent
institution which has given it the authority to intervene and regulate
the conduct of elections
- its success is based on
its administrative competence and the openness and accessibility it
provides to the electoral process.
- For now, its image as a
fierce advocate of democratic principles and values has earned it
public endorsement
|
Contempt Power
|
- Internationally: Kenya and
Pakistan
- credibility
- Challenges:
- Transparency is needed
rather than contempt
- Undemocratic
- Dinesh Goswami denied
this
- prone to abuse
- Satisfaction of people is
supreme and thus transparency and information availability is needed
rather than contempt
|
Comments
Post a Comment