|
Judicial Activism
vs Judicial Overreach.
|
Judicial Activism
|
- Separation of power,
article 50
- Going beyond the domain of
laws of parliament to dispend justice or in domain of legislature and
executive
- Article 13, 32, 142, PIL , Special Leave Petition
|
Examples
|
- Supreme court on plea of
'Swaraj Abhiyan', for proper rehabilitation of Drought hit States
- PIL, Public Interest
Litigation
- Environment like taxes on trucks for entering into capital.
- Tax on trucks could
hamper demand or consumption pattern. This shows the lack of tacking
all the concerns political, economic, environment.
- Banning diesel cars
- Executive
- Correct the discretionary
power of ministries to open petrol pump site
- Directed EC to order
candidates to disclose their criminal conviction, asset
- Monitors the conduct of
investigation and prosecution agency.
- Vishakha guidelines on sexual harassment
- Cancellation of 122 2G
licence and coal block auction
- Even in military operation
in Hazartbal in Kashmir where military as part of strategy restricted
the food supply to hostage which SC diluted by ordering at least 1200 calories to be
supplied.
- Hazartbal siege as part
of military to stop the food supplies
- Proceeding of legislature:
- Ordered the Speaker of
Jharkhand assembly speaker to proceeding as per prescribed agenda and
record them for court, violating article
212 which
forbids courts from inquiring into the legislature
- Madras HC introduced
changes to section 34 to Advocates Act, where it can debar lawyers
involving in corruption, abusing and gherao
- Silencing dissent
- Shielding corrupt Judges
- Striping lawyers immunity
and bar council
- Positive
- Upholding moral and
ethical conduct of judicial-legal sytem
- Seamless judicial
proceeding
- Weeding out corruption
|
Positive
|
- Prakash Singh Case
- Lodha Panel Committee
- Temple Entry
- Democratised the judicial
system
- Hold the executive
accountable
- Made the electoral system
free and fair
- Taj Mahal Cleaning
- Under trials
|
Judicial overreach
|
- National Anthem
- Liquor Ban on highways
- NDRF
- Allahabad HC making
compulsory the children of bureaucrats to study on government schools
|
Issue
|
- Judicial Activism Vs
Judicial over reach or Tyranny or Adventurism
- Have started to creating
laws, tweaking policies and controlling administration
|
Cause
|
- Overzealousness of
judiciary and neglect by the executive
- Legislative inaction :
disruption in parliament
- Lack of Political Will
|
Positive impacts
|
- Democratization of the
judicial system
- Executive accountability
- Made the balance between
the 3 organs very delicate
- National interest
- over coming policy
paralysis
|
Impacts
|
- Lack of expertise for e.g.
in environment matters
- Lack of independent
capacity to enforce and
(resources)
- Court can't bring
meaningful reforms given its institutional limits
- Distrust and disservice to
the government
- Against the separation of
power and Checks and Balances
(Article 50 )
|
Impact on
Judiciary
|
- Decrease in the
credibility (taxi flip-flop repeated
persuasion could force to change its decision )
- Over burden : increasing
pendency (decreasing no. of constitutional cases)
- Will change the nature of
SC(danger of damage to its reputation)
- Demand for accountability
- Have to bear the
criticism
- Could defy its orders
|
Way forward
|
- Equilibrium in exercise of
power should always be maintained
- Only check possible is
self-imposed discipline and self-restraint by judiciary itself
- Doctrine of Self Restraint
- Doctrine Exceptional
circumstances
- Doctrine Principle
Distance
- Guideline for special
Leave petitions and PIL
- SC: warns judges against judicial
overreach
- Discipline and
restriction are the two basic golden virtue
- Purely political and
policy matters not involving core legal issue must be outside
|
Conclusion
|
- Judiciary should safeguard the constitution and not write it,
- Appreciation of its own
institutional limits and institutional credibility
- Democracy hinges on the
delicate balance of power between the judiciary and the parliament and
both have to function within the limitation set by the constitution
|
Comments
Post a Comment