Sedition
- IPC Section 124A, 1870 "excite disaffection towards government established by law"
- Punishment from 3 years to life imprisonment.
- Balances restriction under 19(2)
Supreme court
- Held constitutional in Kedarnath Singh v. State of Bihar case 1962 in the interest of public order
- There has to be causal relationship between speech and act violence and mere speech, regardlessof how subversive it is, does not amount to sedition
- Kanhaiya Kumar vs State (NCT of Delhi) and other cases: Disruption of public order, attempt to violently overthrow a government, threatening the security of state
- Law Commission Paper: Only in cases where intention behind any act is to disrupt public order or overthrow the government with violent and illegal means.
- Balance between FR and Public order
- To curb Separatist tendencies, terrorist propagandas
- National security , integrity
- After Supreme court guidelines, its jurisdiction have been narrowed.
- Part of reasonable restrctions, Article 19(2)
- Dissent allowed but should not lead to violence or public order
- Advocacy
- To curb separatist tendencies which are fuelled in some regions
- Mere misuse cannot be a ground for repeal
- Vagueness and arbitrary allows for misuse (journalists), by govt. had to be loved not hate
- Draconian nature :
- cognisable, non-bailable, non-compoundable has strong deterrent effect on dissent
- Court failed to establish any rational test on how to determine when speech in disaffection of government could be construed as causing a disruption of public order
- Chilling effect on Fos and Right to dissent
- Non- democratic stifles the FR
- Authoritarianism
- Legislation already exists for armed movements and unlawful activities (Preventive detention
- Police don’t have sufficient training to use law.
- Used to gag press.
Examples
- Assem Trivedi cartoonist for mocking Indian costitution
- Hardik patel in Gujarat
- Kanhiya of JNU
- Amensty International allegedly anti Indian slogans
- Divya Spandana alias Ramya MP of AIAADMK on Pakistan, for calling Modi thief
Admitted in parliament that definition of sedition is too vague and broad
How to tackle then?
- · Remove the ambiguity
- · Limited application (minimum use, maximum safeguards)
- · Key is prevent misuse of it by-
- · making speech related offences non-cognisable(need warrant) and bailable
- · Raise the burden of proof on those who claim that their sentiments are hurt
- · Strict action against those who brings malicious complaints including lawyers
- · Narrow down the definition
- · Guideline for proper use and training to police personnel (guideline and sensitise )
- · A balance between security and smooth functioning and Freedom of speech and expression
- · Amend IPC to include SC guidelines in sec 124A
Comments
Post a Comment